Those who denied
poll result were the real coup plotters
Peter Beaumont, The
Observer
The
reality is that the only people who are really
behind Salam Fayyad are the European and US
diplomats who have long sung his praises
behind the scenes to any journalist prepared
to listen.
Sunday June 17, 2007
Here is how democracy works in the Alice in
Wonderland world of Palestinian politics under
the tutelage of the US and international
community. After years of being hectored to
hold elections and adopt democratic norms, a
year and a half ago Palestinians duly elected
Hamas with 44 per cent of the vote, ahead of
Fatah on 41 per cent.
It was a good election, as former US President
Jimmy Carter observed at the time, a free,
fair and accurate expression of the desires of
a Palestinian people sick of the uselessness,
corruption and gangsterism of Fatah. The
problem was that it didn't quite reflect the
wishes of Washington and the international
community.
And while there can be no denying that Hamas,
which refutes the existence of Israel and has
backed suicide bombings, is a threatening
organisation, there was no attempt at
engagement, in the way that Fatah, whose
militants have perpetrated scores of attacks,
has been engaged with for years.
Now, after the months of financial embargo of
the Hamas-led government by the US and Europe,
after the funding and propping up of Fatah's
President Mahmoud Abbas, after the slow,
crushing squeeze on Palestinian society that
encouraged its social disintegration, what
have we got? Virtual civil war in Gaza, the
polarisation of Palestinian society, a
government dissolved by decree, and a new
Prime Minister, Salam Fayyad, appointed with
the explicit blessing of the US.
Let us remind ourselves of the democratic
credentials of Fayyad, an intelligent and
impressive economist, generally regarded as
untouched by corruption. In any other
circumstances he might be ideal. But in last
year's elections to the Palestinian
Legislative Council - the election Hamas won -
Fayyad's list secured just 2.4 per cent of
votes. Not exactly a popular guy to lead a
society in collapse. That is not his only
problem. Analysts of the Palestinian political
scene don't rate Fayyad's lack of democratic
credentials simply on his feeble showing in
the elections.
They'll tell you he is largely unknown to most
Palestinians; that he has no party machinery
to support him; and that his running mate
Hanan Ashrawi is unpopular with many
Palestinians.
The reality is that the only people who are
really behind Salam Fayyad are the European
and US diplomats who have long sung his
praises behind the scenes to any journalist
prepared to listen. So yesterday President
Bush and the other members of the Quartet got
what they wanted. Abbas trooped dutifully in
to see the US consul-general in Jerusalem with
Mohammed Dahlan, the man widely credited with
beginning the cycle of violence in Gaza, in
tow. And when they emerged, the boycott of US
monies to the Palestinian government had been
lifted.
It is hard not to be cynical. Palestinian
society was squeezed until it hurt - punished
as a whole for voting for the wrong party. And
when the inevitable explosion occurred last
week, Abbas finally fired Hamas, as the US has
been encouraging him to do amid his months of
dithering.
So which was the real coup? Hamas's bloody
attack on the violent gangsters allied to
Fatah who have terrorised Gaza for a year? Or
Abbas's unconstitutional moves yesterday with
America's backing?
Either way, once again it is Palestinians who
will suffer.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,,2104888,00.html
|