Questa Redazione, pur non condividendo sempre e
necessariamente tutte le dichiarazioni degli autori nei testi citati, reputa
che esse siano comunque utili fonti di informazione e riflessione
.
Non omologati in alcun schieramento, in rispetto della libertà di pensiero e
d'espressione garantite costituzionalmente, riteniamo irrinunciabile e
giusto dare spazio a molte voci del dissenso, altrove negate.
Illusions versus reality:
NATO and Afghan opium
Natalia Makarova - RT.com - 30 March 2010
NATO and Russia have failed to reach a consensus in a
tug of war over tackling the Afghan drug problem. The alliance has
rejected Moscow’s appeal to eradicate opium poppy fields in the Islamic
Republic.
Commenting on the move, Viktor Ivanov, the head of
Russia’s Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN), said it is “confusing,
to say the least.”
Earlier Thursday, Reuters reports, NATO spokesman
James Appathurai said, "We cannot be in a situation where we remove
the only source of income of people who live in the second-poorest
country in the world without being able to provide them with an
alternative."
According to Ivanov, such an approach looks strange
in the current situation. “If one goes on with this 'concern for the
people', one should point out that the price of opium has dropped from
$90 to $60 per kilogram,” he is quoted as saying by Itar-Tass.
“So, one could assume that it is necessary to increase the area of the
plantations by 50 per cent."
The head of Russia’s drug control watchdog said the
alliance’s statements “run counter to the UN resolution on the
obligation of all the countries to destroy plantations with
narcotics-containing crops".
Drug smugglers easily transport Afghan heroin and
opium into Central Asia and Russia, and thence to Western Europe.
According to statistics "the losses of the civilian population of
Europe caused by opium-based narcotics exceed the losses of the NATO
military contingent in Afghanistan by 50 times."
The idea of creating the alliance, Ivanov said, was
to protect the member states from outside threats. "At present NATO
is not fulfilling its task of protecting the population of its countries
against the threat of drugs distribution," Ivanov said.
"Afghanistan produces heroin in enormous amounts. It has actually been
turned into the world’s 'heroin-basket'."
While the main headaches for Moscow are the
terrifying statistics on drug flow from Afghanistan and thousands of
deaths caused by narcotics, the West, pursuing its tangled strategy,
does not want to anger the Afghan population and thus lose their
loyalty. Despite talks on co-operation and mutual promises, the whole
business still looks a bit like a tug of war, with each side having its
own truth and interest.
"We are still waiting for an answer, but we know
the Russian Federation is working on it,"
he said.
On Wednesday, during an expanded session of the
Russia-NATO Council in Brussels, Ivanov presented Moscow’s seven-point
plan on fighting drug production in Afghanistan and suggested creating a
joint group with the alliance to tackle the problem.
Among other ideas, the plan included “an upgrade
of the status of the Afghan drug production problem in the UN Security
Council to the level of a threat to world peace and security."
Also, Moscow suggested that the International
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) would eliminate opium poppy plantations
in Afghanistan using chemicals. And that is what the two sides failed to
agree on. While sharing the view that the issue has to be addressed,
Appathurai said “there is a slight difference of views”.
“Out of Moscow we hear a lot of calls for
eradication. The view of the Afghan government up until now is that
eradication is not the way to go…in particular aerial spraying,"
the NATO spokesman said as Reuters cites. "We have 120,000 people on
the ground fighting the insurgency and that is the most effective way to
tackle the drug problem."
The “effectiveness” of the campaign – which has been
going on for eight years now – looks questionable, since opium
production has soared to record levels. According to the Russian
official, “a reserve for future generations” of 12,000 tonnes of opium –
the key ingredient for heroin – has been created in the Islamic state,
Rosbalt information agency writes.
NATO, however, argues that with such enormous amounts
being stocked, eliminating poppy fields would not make much difference.
The Russian official reiterated that, thanks to the
efforts of the world community, almost all opium poppies were eliminated
and drug production had been curbed by 2002. However, since 9/11, the
priorities in the approaches have changed.
”The resolute struggle with the Afghan drug threat
cannot be delayed either to the full conflict settlement or the
improvement of the economic situation or more favorable weather
conditions," Ivanov said. "Just the
opposite, it is impossible to achieve the settlement of the current
conflict situation and the establishment of peace without a cardinal
solution to the problems of drug cultivation, production and drug
trafficking."
The alliance said it is ready destroy poppy crops,
but only those that are meant to bring money to the Taliban – that is
from $70 to $150 million. The rest, according to Ivanov, will be left to
the Afghan government. Meanwhile, with 800 tons of opium being produced
annually, one third is exported – 35 per cent of it to Russia – bringing
Afghanistan’s drug lords the enormous sum of about $65 billion. That is
in a country with GDP of slightly above $10 billion, according to Global
Finance magazine.
Corruption is rampant in war-torn Afghanistan,
according to a UN report published early this year. It has been
speculated in the media that many in the country’s government, including
Afghan President Hamid Karzai's brother, Ahmed Karzai, are allegedly
linked to the profitable drug trade business. In that respect, it is
quite understandable that they are against the eradication of opium
poppies.
But would keeping opium poppies plantations as source
of income for locals really serve its purpose and help the Afghan
population? According to Ivanov, up to 100,000 people in Afghanistan die
from drug use each year.
Tutte le notizie e articoli contenuti in questo spazio web
sono liberamente riproducibili (salvo successive controindicazioni
degli autori e/o degli editori distributori) purchè
citandone integralmente tutte le fonti (inclusa questa), gli
autori, i traduttori e i links :
informazione e
contro-informazione devono essere libere e alla portata di tutti. Chi,
divulgando questi notiziari, omette di fornire le indicazioni sopra
citate, o impedisce in qualsiasi modo la libera veicolazione delle
notizie, sabota gravemente la libera informazione.